NoMoreBlather

You support the Senate immigration bill, and you claim that it isn't 'amnesty'. Isn't that simply a game of semantics? No matter what you want to call it, isn't it a fact that not only the great majority of Americans will perceive it to be amnesty, but millions of prospective illegal aliens around the world will perceive it as amnesty? You could call it a "banana" if you wanted, but isn't what's really important how it's perceived around the world? Do you seriously think that millions of people in other countries will not see it as amnesty?

An alternate question based on the transcript below would ask him about his semantic games regarding social security benefits for illegal aliens.

----------------
[1] From the October 12 Santorum/Casey debate (main, video segment)
Casey: "First of all I think what you heard as well is an assertion by Senator Santorum that I want illegal immigrants to have social security benefits, I don't, and no one does. Secondly, he's using this term amnesty. It's a great way to demagogue in a campaign where he's having some trouble. The only problem with his misrepresentation of that is Senator Specter says what was in that bill was not amnesty and Senator McCain. So, are they telling the truth, Rick, when they say that? Because they agree with me on that question."
--------------
Part of the traffic jam.