No More Blather

For those who want quick questions that don't require a script, here's one:

Very quick question for you: I believe that massive illegal immigration is an indicator of massive government corruption. Do you agree, or disagree?

Then, at that time or a later date, a follow-up could be asked. If the answer was 'no':

The FDIC is working with U.S. banks and the Mexican government to help illegal aliens obtain mortgages in Chicago. You've previously said that illegal immigration isn't an indicator of corruption, but isn't that an example of government corruption? That is, a government agency is trying to help private companies profit from money that was earned illegally. That seems to me like a very strong indicator of government corruption. Do you agree, or disagree?

With enough questions like that, the candidate would eventually be forced to say "yes". Then, they could be asked something like these:

You've previously agreed that illegal immigration is an indicator of political corruption. Besides pushing for "comprehensive immigration reform", what specific legislation have you written, sponsored, or voted for that had as its goal a reduction of illegal immigration?

Or, more specifically:

You're previously agreed that the FDIC working with U.S. banks and the Mexican government to help illegal aliens obtain mortgages in Chicago is an indicator of government corruption. Please detail exactly what you intend to do about it this year.

Alternatively, if their answer involves CIR:

You're previously agreed that the FDIC working with U.S. banks and the Mexican government to help illegal aliens obtain mortgages in Chicago is an indicator of government corruption. You've stated that your only solution to that corruption is to pass "comprehensive immigration reform". Yet, many believe that will lead to more illegal immigration, and passing "reform" will give more power to those who currently oppose immigration enforcement. They'll use that additional political power to oppose the enforcement which is mandated by "reform". Isn't there a good chance that your solution will lead to more illegal immigration, and more government corruption? Why won't you fight against government corruption separately from "comprehensive immigration reform"?